Barbour v. Johnson

380 F. App'x 355
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2010·No. No. 10-6076·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Edward Barbour seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order directing the Respondent to answer his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Barbour seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny what we construe as a motion to expedite a decision in this appeal and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barbour v. Johnson, 380 F. App'x 355 (4th Cir. 2010).

380 F. App'x 355 (Barbour v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)