Barbour v. 43rd United States President

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 12, 2011
DocketCivil Action No. 2011-2217
StatusPublished

This text of Barbour v. 43rd United States President (Barbour v. 43rd United States President) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barbour v. 43rd United States President, (D.D.C. 2011).

Opinion

8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 KENNETH BARBOUR, No. CIV S-11-3204 CMK P

12 Plaintiff,

13 vs. ORDER

14 The 43rd United States President,

15 Defendant.

16 /

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant

18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In light of 1996

19 amendments to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, this court will not rule on plaintiff's request to proceed in

20 forma pauperis.

21 The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on

22 diversity jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all

23 defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events

24 or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject

25 of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is

26 no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

1 1 In this case, the defendant is located and the claim arose in Washington, D.C.,

2 which is in the District of Columbia. Therefore, plaintiff’s claim should have been filed in the

3 United States District Court for the District of Columbia. In the interest of justice, a federal court

4 may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C.

5 § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

7 1. This court has not ruled on plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis; and

8 2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the District of

9 Columbia.

11 DATED: December 9, 2011 12 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON 13 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14

17 /kly barb 11cv3204.21a 18

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Barbour v. 43rd United States President, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barbour-v-43rd-united-states-president-dcd-2011.