Barbosa v. Ventura

69 A.D.3d 710, 891 N.Y.2d 665
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[711] The Family Court improperly, in effect, dismissed the father’s objections to the order dismissing his petition on the ground that neither party appeared at the hearing before the Support Magistrate on September 11, 2008. The Family Court should have considered the father’s objections on the merits, since the record evinces that both parties appeared before the Support Magistrate (Weir-Reeves, S.M.), on September 11, 2008, and that the Support Magistrate dismissed the father’s petition on the merits. Accordingly, we reverse the order appealed from and remit the matter to the Family Court, Kings County, for consideration and determination of the father’s objections on the merits (see Matter of Telfer v Telfer, 44 AD3d 780 [2007]; Matter of Etuk v Etuk, 300 AD2d 483 [2002]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Miller and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barbosa v. Ventura, 69 A.D.3d 710, 891 N.Y.2d 665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

69 A.D.3d 710 (Barbosa v. Ventura) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Puzack v. Friderich
74 A.D.3d 1208 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)