Barbier v. United States
36 Cust. Ct. 344
United States Customs Court·Decided February 16, 1956·No. No. 59724; protest 255991-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
An examination of the record showing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, same was dismissed as untimely. Following Sucrest Corporation v. United States (31 C. C. P. A. 220, C. A. D. 275), it was further held that payment of duties is a condition precedent to the right to file a protest.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barbier v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 344 (cusc 1956).
36 Cust. Ct. 344 (Barbier v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.