Barbetta v. Gristede Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barbetta v. Gristede Bros.

259 A.D. 828, 20 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6878

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 8, 1940·Published

Opinion

Action by plaintiff to recover damages for injuries claimed to have been sustained as the result of eating food unfit for human consumption, on the theory of implied warranty. Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers in favor of the respondent, Gristede Bros., Inc., dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The question of agency was determined by the trial court as one of fact. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by plaintiff to recover damages for injuries claimed to have been sustained as the result of eating food unfit for human consumption, on the theory of implied warranty. Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers in favor of the respondent, Gristede Bros., Inc., dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The question of agency was determined by the trial court as one of fact. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Barbetta v. Gristede Bros., 259 A.D. 828, 20 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 828 (Barbetta v. Gristede Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.