Barberic v. Catholic Diocese

743 N.E.2d 920, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1235
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 28, 2001
DocketNo. 00-1067
StatusPublished

This text of 743 N.E.2d 920 (Barberic v. Catholic Diocese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barberic v. Catholic Diocese, 743 N.E.2d 920, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1235 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Nurenberg, Plevin, Heller & McCarthy Co., L.P.A., David M. Paris, Kathleen J. St. John and Brenda M. Johnson, for appellant. Edward J. Maher, for appellees Catholic Diocese of Cleveland and Most Reverend Anthony M. Pilla William T. Doyle, for appellee Father Gary Berthiuame. William T. Monroe, for appellee Father Allen F. Bruening. Bonezzi, Switzer, Murphy & Polito Co., L.P.A., Beth A. Sebaugh and Patrick J. Quallich, for appellees Ascension Catholic Church and Ascension School. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Robert C. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
743 N.E.2d 920, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barberic-v-catholic-diocese-ohio-2001.