Barberi v. State

542 So. 2d 473, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1102, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2486, 1989 WL 46199
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 4, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1280
StatusPublished

This text of 542 So. 2d 473 (Barberi v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barberi v. State, 542 So. 2d 473, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1102, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2486, 1989 WL 46199 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal of restitution orders entered pursuant to appellant’s five criminal convictions. We must remand in order that the trial court specify the amount of restitution in the five sentencing orders. As to three of the offenses, the amounts are set out in the presentence investigation report and need only be transcribed into the orders. For two of the cases, however, restitution amounts were not specified in the presen-tence investigation report, and a hearing is required to set the amounts.

ERVIN, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 So. 2d 473, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1102, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2486, 1989 WL 46199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barberi-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.