Barbera v. Midway Land Co., Inc.

453 So. 2d 645, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 9248
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 29, 1984
Docket83-CA-736
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 453 So. 2d 645 (Barbera v. Midway Land Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barbera v. Midway Land Co., Inc., 453 So. 2d 645, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 9248 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

453 So.2d 645 (1984)

Charles Francis BARBERA
v.
MIDWAY LAND COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 83-CA-736.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

June 29, 1984.
Rehearing Denied September 17, 1984.

*646 Steven F. Griffith, Sr., Destrehan, and Joseph V. Bologna, New Orleans, for Charles Francis Barbera, plaintiff-appellant.

Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, New Orleans, and Leon C. Vial, III, Hahnville, for Midway Land Company Inc., et al. defendants-appellees.

Before BOUTALL, BOWES and GAUDIN, JJ.

BOUTALL, Judge.

This is a petitory action involving ownership of certain batture land on the Mississippi River in St. Charles Parish. From a judgment in favor of the defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

Charles Francis Barbera ("Charles") seeks to be declared the rightful owner of batture land that he alleges formed part of a larger tract that his late father, Charles Barbera ("Barbera"), owned as his separate property. The plaintiff claims to have inherited the batture in his father's succession. The defendants, presently in possession, are Midway Land Company, Inc. ("Midway"), CharlesTowne Homeowners Association, Inc. ("CharlesTowne"), Point Landing, Inc., Donald Wood, Glenn Douglas Wood, American River Transportation Company, and Archer, Daniels, Midland Company. Midway and CharlesTowne are transferees of the original tract. Donald Wood and Glenn Douglas Wood are principal shareholders of Midway and Point Landing (a lessee), which companies merged into Wood Resources Corporation after the suit was filed. The other two defendants are lessees of Midway (Wood Resources Corporation).

In 1917 Charles Barbera purchased a large tract of land situated on Almedia Plantation from Robert Frank Foy. Barbera sold the tract to Myown Farms, Inc. in 1941. In 1972 a subsequent owner, United Acceptance Corporation, donated a portion of the tract to CharlesTowne for a "Common Area." Midway purchased the remainder of the tract in 1976. Sometime after 1941 and before 1972, Barbera had died and his succession had been opened. On August 13, 1979, a supplemental and amended judgment of possession was signed. That judgment recognizes Charles as the sole heir of his father's one half of the community and of all his separate property, including that portion of the Almedia tract that lies between the Jefferson Highway and the Mississippi River.

*647 The plaintiff alleges that the tract his father acquired from Robert Frank Foy in 1917 extended to the river and included the batture. He contends that the sale from Barbera to Myown Farms did not include the batture, that the batture was not transferred in subsequent sales, that he inherited the land from his father, and that the defendants and their lessees are trespassers.

Charles filed a petitory action on March 12, 1980. A motion for summary judgment was filed by the defendants on the ground that the boundary of the land acquired by Barbera in 1917 was the public road, not the river; however, that motion was denied. After a trial of the merits, judgment was rendered on August 12, 1983, declaring that Charles Francis Barbera is not the owner of the land in question; further, that the 1941 purchaser, Myown Farms, Inc., and its successors and assigns, are not the owners but the court will not disturb their possession of the land. In his reasons for judgment the trial judge stated that the land was not included in maps referred to in the act transferring the original tract to Barbera; and where there is a discrepancy between the map and the property description the map controls. As Barbera had never owned the batture, Charles had not inherited it nor did Myown Farms purchase it from Barbera.

The issues before us are, first, whether the common ancestor held title to the batture land and, second, if so whether any rights to title were transmitted to the defendants.

The Civil Code articles governing ownership of an immovable, as amended in 1979, provide:

"Art. 531. Proof of ownership of immovable.
One who claims the ownership of an immovable against another in possession must prove that he has acquired ownership from a previous owner or by acquisitive prescription. If neither party is in possession, he need only prove a better title."
"Art. 532. Common author
When the titles of the parties are traced to a common author, he is presumed to be the previous owner."

Proof of title to an immovable in a petitory action is set out in La.C.C.P. art. 3653, as amended in 1981, as follows:

"To obtain a judgment recognizing his ownership of immovable property or real right therein, the plaintiff in a petitory action shall:
(1) Prove that he has acquired ownership from a previous owner or by acquisitive prescription, if the court finds that the defendant is in possession thereof; or
(2) Prove a better title thereto than the defendant, if the court finds that the latter is not in possession thereof.
When the titles of the parties are traced to a common author, he is presumed to be the previous owner."

Under the facts of this case, where it is undisputed that the titles of both parties are traced to a common owner, Barbera, and the defendant is in possession, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove his title back to the common owner. Weaver v. Hailey, 416 So.2d 311 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1982); Comment, 55 Tul.L.Rev. 192 (1980). Accordingly, we must first determine whether the court was correct in finding that the Foy to Barbera sale of 1917 failed to transfer the batture land to Barbera.

Louisiana jurisprudence regarding land at the water's edge dates back to the nineteenth century and involves property transfers taking place as early as the eighteenth century. The early cases held that where an estate is bounded by the Mississippi River or is described as fronting on the river then it is understood to include the rights to any alluvion that may form, at the same time being subject to any diminution from erosion of the banks. Morgan v. Livingston, et al, 6 Mart. (O.S.) 19 (La.1819), and cases cited therein. Morgan was followed in LaBranche's Heirs v. Montegut, 47 La.Ann. 677, 17 So. 247 (1895) and Meyers v. Mathis, 42 La.Ann. 471, 7 So. 605 (1890). See also Hayward v. *648 Noel, 225 So.2d 638 (La.App. 1st Cir.1969). The right to accretion is an accessory of the riparian estate. However, once alluvial soil has so built up along the water's edge as to appear above the water at its ordinary stage, the resulting land or batture becomes susceptible of ownership separate from the riparian estate. Maginnis Land & Improvement Co. v. Marcello, 168 La. 997, 123 So. 653 (1929); State v. Richardson, 140 La. 329, 72 So. 984 (1916). If the batture has so formed at the time of sale of property belonging to a riparian estate, it must be specifically mentioned in the act to be transferred to the new owner. Ferriere v. City of New Orleans, 35 La.Ann. 209 (La.1883); Cambre v. Kohn, 8 Mart (N.S.) 572 (La.1830); Tassin v. Rhynes, 366 So.2d 580 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1978), writs refused 368 So.2d 123 (La.1978); Tregre v. Lasseigne, 413 So.2d 218 (La.App. 4th Cir.1982).

The property description in the 1917 act of sale between Foy and Barbera reads as follows:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

P&G, LLC v. Shingle Point, LLC
273 So. 3d 371 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019)
Andermann v. Rouillier
271 So. 3d 384 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019)
McDaniel v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc.
560 So. 2d 676 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1990)
Riverlands Fleeting Corp. v. Milliken & Farwell, Inc.
515 So. 2d 512 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
River Lands Fleeting Corp. v. Ashland Plantation, Inc.
498 So. 2d 38 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
Barbera v. Midway Land Co.
460 So. 2d 609 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 So. 2d 645, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 9248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barbera-v-midway-land-co-inc-lactapp-1984.