Barbera v. DeRostaing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barbera v. DeRostaing

140 A.D.2d 660, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6126

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 31, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 A.D.2d 660 (Barbera v. DeRostaing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barbera v. DeRostaing, 140 A.D.2d 660, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In view of the plaintiffs’ failure to provide any reasonable excuse for their extensive delay in serving their bill of particulars, their failure to comply with the court’s conditional order of preclusion, and their failure to submit an affidavit of merit, the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted unconditionally and the complaint dismissed (see, La Buda v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp. Med. Center, 98 AD2d 711, affd 62 NY2d 1014; Bailey v North Shore Univ. Hosp., 91 AD2d 967, affd 59 NY2d 748). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In view of the plaintiffs’ failure to provide any reasonable excuse for their extensive delay in serving their bill of particulars, their failure to comply with the court’s conditional order of preclusion, and their failure to submit an affidavit of merit, the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted unconditionally and the complaint dismissed (see, La Buda v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp. Med. Center, 98 AD2d 711, affd 62 NY2d 1014; Bailey v North Shore Univ. Hosp., 91 AD2d 967, affd 59 NY2d 748). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 A.D.2d 660, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barbera-v-derostaing-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack