Barber Vs. Dist. Ct. (State, Dep'T Of Family Servs.)
This text of Barber Vs. Dist. Ct. (State, Dep'T Of Family Servs.) (Barber Vs. Dist. Ct. (State, Dep'T Of Family Servs.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
GEORGETTE B.; AND RASHONDRA B.- No. 80808 S., Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN FILE AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; APR 1 6 nitri 0 AND THE HONORABLE CYNTHIA N. EL EEVt PAVAN GIULIANI, DISTRICT JUDGE, CLE OF?;k.,,TA • COU ()......_. Respondents, DEPUTY CLERK and STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion for placement of a child. Having considered the petition and supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition); Philip R. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 134 Nev. 223, 228-29, 416 P.3d 242, 247-48
SUPREPAE COURT OF NEvADA
(0) 1947A (2018) (providing that the primary consideration in a placement decision is the child's best interest). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Parraguirre
, J. Hardesty
, J. Cadish
cc: Hon. Cynthia N. Giuliani, District Judge The Grigsby Law Group Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A akelt>
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barber Vs. Dist. Ct. (State, Dep'T Of Family Servs.), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-vs-dist-ct-state-dept-of-family-servs-nev-2020.