Barber v. Town of North Kingstown

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Barber v. Town of North Kingstown

368 A.2d 1258, 117 R.I. 966, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1746

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJanuary 6, 1977

DocketM. P. No. 76-341

StatusPublished

This text of 368 A.2d 1258 (Barber v. Town of North Kingstown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barber v. Town of North Kingstown, 368 A.2d 1258, 117 R.I. 966, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1746 (R.I. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiffs have moved for a reconsidera-

tion of the vacation of the stay in this case on the basis of Tantimonaco v. Zoning Board of Johnston, 102 R.I. 594, 232 [967]*967A2d 385 (1967). Since that case is not applicable and the applicant for zoning change in this case is proceeding at its own risk, the motion for reconsideration is denied. This case is specially assigned to the calendar for February 11, 1977 for oral argument, at 9:30 a.m.

Hanson, Curran, Bowen & Parks, A. Lauriston Parks, for petitioners. Bernard F. McSally, Town Solicitor, Moore, Virgadamo, Boyle & Lynch, Ltd. Francis J. Boyle (amicus curiae), Paul P. Pederzani, Jr. (amicus curiae), for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiffs have moved for a reconsidera-

tion of the vacation of the stay in this case on the basis of Tantimonaco v. Zoning Board of Johnston, 102 R.I. 594, 232 [967]*967A2d 385 (1967). Since that case is not applicable and the applicant for zoning change in this case is proceeding at its own risk, the motion for reconsideration is denied. This case is specially assigned to the calendar for February 11, 1977 for oral argument, at 9:30 a.m.

Hanson, Curran, Bowen & Parks, A. Lauriston Parks, for petitioners. Bernard F. McSally, Town Solicitor, Moore, Virgadamo, Boyle & Lynch, Ltd. Francis J. Boyle (amicus curiae), Paul P. Pederzani, Jr. (amicus curiae), for respondents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

368 A.2d 1258, 117 R.I. 966, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-town-of-north-kingstown-ri-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack