Barber v. Time For Peace PLLC

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas
DecidedApril 14, 2021
Docket3:19-cv-00367
StatusUnknown

This text of Barber v. Time For Peace PLLC (Barber v. Time For Peace PLLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barber v. Time For Peace PLLC, (E.D. Ark. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

BROOKE BARBER PLAINTIFF

Vv. No. 3:19-cv-367-DPM

TIME FOR PEACE, PLLC and APRIL TIMMS DEFENDANTS

ORDER 1. Defendants’ motion to amend their answer, Doc. 28, is granted for good cause, with conditions. FED. R. CIv. P. 15(a)(2). Defendants denied the annual-sales allegation, Doc. 3 at § 17, and then they admitted it, Doc. 15 at § 20. This was, they say, a mistake. Doc. 28 at □ 2. That’s good cause for a late change to make the answer accurately reflect Defendants’ position. The conditions are these. Defendants must make April Timms available for a two-hour deposition —at the convenience of Plaintiff's counsel and at Defendants’ expense — before 30 April 2021. Three calendar days before any deposition, Defendants must also produce copies of any annual-sales-related documents requested by Plaintiff. Plaintiff must file any notice of deposition and list of requested documents by 20 April 2021. Whether to take this deposition, request documents, or both is entirely Plaintiff's choice. The opportunity for this discovery will eliminate any trial-related prejudice to Plaintiff.

2. Defendants’ motion to file a belated motion for summary judgment, Doc. 26, is denied. Defendants have not shown good cause for the belated motion. Petrone v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., 940 F.3d 425, 434 (8th Cir. 2019); FED. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). Plaintiff conducted discovery without the benefit of the tax returns until right before discovery closed. Defendants made a tactical choice not to seek

summary judgment in a timely motion using the returns. Doc. 26 at 1. And there’s no gross annual sales requirement under the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act, ARK. CODE ANN. § 11-4-203(4)(B), so the state law claim would be unaffected. The most efficient and fairest way forward is to try this case. So Ordered.

Anal □□ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 14 202)

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Philip Petrone v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.
940 F.3d 425 (Eighth Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Barber v. Time For Peace PLLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-time-for-peace-pllc-ared-2021.