Barber v. Stauch
This text of 173 A.D. 998 (Barber v. Stauch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment affirmed, with costs, but without prejudice to another action upon the same claim if plaintiff is so advised. Held, the plaintiff, having consented to an adjournment, was not entitled to judgment as of course, although his complaint was verified, without making proof of his cause of action, an answer having thereafter been filed containing a general denial. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 A.D. 998, 159 N.Y.S. 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-stauch-nyappdiv-1916.