Barber v. State
864 So. 2d 1171, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 2004 WL 19507
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 2, 2004·No. Nos. 5D03-1291, 5D03-1344, 5D03-1568·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm the defendants’ convictions for trafficking and conspiracy to traffic in GHB based upon our agreement with the analysis contained in Urruchurtu v. State, 858 So.2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003),1 which refutes the arguments raised herein.
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barber v. State, 864 So. 2d 1171, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 2004 WL 19507 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
864 So. 2d 1171 (Barber v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cordova v. State
876 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Tabor v. State
864 So. 2d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)