Barber v. State
864 So. 2d 1171, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 2004 WL 19507
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 2, 2004
DocketNos. 5D03-1291, 5D03-1344, 5D03-1568
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 864 So. 2d 1171 (Barber v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barber v. State, 864 So. 2d 1171, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 2004 WL 19507 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
We affirm the defendants’ convictions for trafficking and conspiracy to traffic in GHB based upon our agreement with the analysis contained in Urruchurtu v. State, 858 So.2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003),1 which refutes the arguments raised herein.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cordova v. State
876 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Tabor v. State
864 So. 2d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
864 So. 2d 1171, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 2004 WL 19507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.