Barber v. State

387 So. 2d 540, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17134
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barber v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 413 So. 2d 482
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 10, 1980·No. No. 78-2665/T4-330·Published

Opinion

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge.

This is an appeal from an order withholding an adjudication of guilt and placing appellant on probation for five years.

Appellant questions the court’s imposition of condition 12 of the probation order which provided:

You will consent to search, without a warrant of your person, automobile, or premises upon request of any law enforcement officer or probation officer and/or submit to chemical or specimen analysis for evidence of drugs.

The provision is valid insofar as it permits appellant’s probation supervisors to make these searches, but is not valid insofar as it grants blanket permission for warrantless searches to any law enforcement officer. Grubbs v. State, 373 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1979); Smith v. State, 383 So.2d 991 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Wood v. State, 378 So.2d 110 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Condition 12 of the probation order is modified to apply only to probation supervisors and as modified, the order is AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barber v. State, 387 So. 2d 540, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17134 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

387 So. 2d 540 (Barber v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
383 So. 2d 991 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Grubbs v. State
373 So. 2d 905 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Wood v. State
378 So. 2d 110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)