Barber v. State

143 Ala. 1
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 143 Ala. 1 (Barber v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barber v. State, 143 Ala. 1 (Ala. 1904).

Opinion

McClellan, C. J.

This cause was tried by the circuit court of St. Clair county, sitting at Pell City in said county, under the supposed authority of ordinance No. 390, nominally adopted by the Constitutional Convention of 1901, and certain acts of the legislature intended to carry said ordinance into effect. That ordinance and those acts were held in Ex parte Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad Co., (MS.) to be void. It follows that there was no authority of law for holding said court at Pell City, and, on the principles declared in Ex parte Branch, 63 Ala., 383, and Jackson et al v. State, 102 Ala. 76, it must be now ruled that the judgment rendered at Pell City on the trial then had is void, and will not support an appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barber v. State
43 So. 808 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 Ala. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-state-ala-1904.