Barber v. Oxios

668 So. 2d 1051, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1580, 1996 WL 72212
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 1996·No. No. 93-3519·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse. The trial court granted summary judgment, determining that California Insurance Code section 11580.2(i) (West 1994) required the filing of a suit against the uninsured tortfeasor as a condition precedent to recovery under a contract of uninsured/underinsured insurance execut[1052] ed in California. However, subsequent to the trial court’s order, the California Supreme Court determined that section 11580.2(i) did not apply to underinsured motorist claims. Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co., 11 Cal.4th 1049, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 1, 906 P.2d 1057 (Cal.1995). We apply the law in effect at the time of the appellate decision. Cantor v. Davis, 489 So.2d 18 (Fla.1986). From the record this appears to be an accident involving an underinsured tortfeasor, although this determination was not made by the trial court. Therefore, we remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., and KROLL, KATHLEEN J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barber v. Oxios, 668 So. 2d 1051, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1580, 1996 WL 72212 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

668 So. 2d 1051 (Barber v. Oxios) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.
906 P.2d 1057 (California Supreme Court, 1995)
Cantor v. Davis
489 So. 2d 18 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)