Barber v. North Adams, City of
This text of Barber v. North Adams, City of (Barber v. North Adams, City of) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 01-2283
RICHARD I. BARBER,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF NORTH ADAMS, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Michael A. Ponsor, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Lynch, Circuit Judge, Campbell and Stahl, Senior Circuit Judges.
Richard Barber on brief pro se. James W. Simpson, Jr. and Merrick, Louison & Costello on brief for appellees.
March 19, 2002 Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the judgment
below in light of the record, the prior judicial proceedings, and
the issues raised in the briefs on appeal, the judgment of the
district court dismissing this suit as barred by the statute of
limitations is affirmed.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barber v. North Adams, City of, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-north-adams-city-of-ca1-2002.