Barber v. Mellish-Hayward Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Barber v. Mellish-Hayward Co.

209 Ill. App. 299

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided January 28, 1918·No. Gen. No. 23,468·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and erbob, § 864*—when record not searched for information to reverse judgment. To reverse a judgment, the reviewing court will not go to the record for information which the plaintiff in error should have furnished in the' abstract. 5. Appeal and erbob, § 1752*—when judgment affirmed. A judgment will be affirmed where appellant fails to file a complete abstract or abridgment of the record as required by rule 18 of the Appellate Court, and the evidence, as ascertained from the statements in the briefs, is conflicting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and erbob, § 864*—when record not searched for information to reverse judgment. To reverse a judgment, the reviewing court will not go to the record for information which the plaintiff in error should have furnished in the' abstract. 5. Appeal and erbob, § 1752*—when judgment affirmed. A judgment will be affirmed where appellant fails to file a complete abstract or abridgment of the record as required by rule 18 of the Appellate Court, and the evidence, as ascertained from the statements in the briefs, is conflicting.

Barber v. Mellish-Hayward Co., 209 Ill. App. 299 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

209 Ill. App. 299 (Barber v. Mellish-Hayward Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related