Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Barber v. Mellish-Hayward Co.

Barber v. Mellish-Hayward Co.

209 Ill. App. 299
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 28, 1918
DocketGen. No. 23,468
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 Ill. App. 299 (Barber v. Mellish-Hayward Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barber v. Mellish-Hayward Co., 209 Ill. App. 299 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and erbob, § 864*—when record not searched for information to reverse judgment. To reverse a judgment, the reviewing court will not go to the record for information which the plaintiff in error should have furnished in the' abstract. 5. Appeal and erbob, § 1752*—when judgment affirmed. A judgment will be affirmed where appellant fails to file a complete abstract or abridgment of the record as required by rule 18 of the Appellate Court, and the evidence, as ascertained from the statements in the briefs, is conflicting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deterding v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.
223 Ill. App. 374 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 Ill. App. 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-mellish-hayward-co-illappct-1918.