Barber v. Louisiana Workforce Commission

221 So. 3d 38, 2017 WL 2436666, 2017 La. LEXIS 1240
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 5, 2017
DocketNO. 2017-CA-0750
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 221 So. 3d 38 (Barber v. Louisiana Workforce Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barber v. Louisiana Workforce Commission, 221 So. 3d 38, 2017 WL 2436666, 2017 La. LEXIS 1240 (La. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

[ i Defendants, the Louisiana Workforce Commission, the Louisiana Office of Workers’ Compensation, and numerous state officers (collectively referred to hereinafter as “State”), invoke the appellate jurisdiction of this court pursuant to La. Const, art. V, § 5(D), on the ground that the district court declared certain provisions of the medical treatment schedule contained in the Workers Compensation Act to be unconstitutional.

Pretermitting the merits, we find the appeal is not properly before this court. Article V, § 5(D) vests appellate jurisdiction in this court in cases in which “a law or ordinance has been declared unconstitutional. ...” A review of the district court’s judgment indicates the court permanently enjoined the application of certain medical treatment schedule provisions. However, nothing in the district court’s judgment declares a law or ordinance, unconstitutional.

Although the district court’s reasons for judgment discuss the constitutionality of the medical treatment schedule provisions, it is well-settled law that the district court’s oral or written reasons form no part of the judgment. In the absence of declaration of unconstitutionality in the district court’s judgment, this court lacks [ 2appellate jurisdiction. See Meaux v. Galtier, 07-2474 at p. 1 (La. 1/25/08), 972 So.2d 1137; Carmena v. East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff’s Office, 06-2680 (La. 2/2/07), 947 So.2d 715; Burmaster v. Plaquemines Parish Government, 07-1311 (La. 8/31/07), 963 So.2d 378; Greater New Orleans Expressway Com’n v. Olivier, 02-2795 (La. 11/18/03), 860 So.2d 22.

Pursuant to La. Code Civ. P. art. 2162, “[i]f an appeal is taken to an appellate court which has no jurisdiction over it, the court may transfer the appeal to the proper court....” Accordingly, the appeal is hereby transferred to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barber v. La. Workforce Comm'n
266 So. 3d 368 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 So. 3d 38, 2017 WL 2436666, 2017 La. LEXIS 1240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-louisiana-workforce-commission-la-2017.