Barber v. Lomenzo

212 N.E.2d 769, 16 N.Y.2d 963, 265 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1062
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 26, 1965·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. Within the intent of the Election Law sections, the Appellate Division’s decision is correct. We need not pass on any constitutional question. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the order of Special Term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barber v. Lomenzo, 212 N.E.2d 769, 16 N.Y.2d 963, 265 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1062 (N.Y. 1965).

212 N.E.2d 769 (Barber v. Lomenzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wein v. Thomas
78 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)