Barber v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
16 N.E.2d 94, 278 N.Y. 540, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1387
Opinion
In each action: judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hobbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippet, JJ. Dissenting as to Jewel Tea Co., Inc.: Lehman and O’Brien, JJ. TaMng no part: Crane, Ch. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barber v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc., 16 N.E.2d 94, 278 N.Y. 540, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1387 (N.Y. 1938).
16 N.E.2d 94 (Barber v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leotta v. Plessinger
171 N.E.2d 454 (New York Court of Appeals, 1960)
Adams v. State
269 A.D. 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Haase v. City of Buffalo
255 A.D. 357 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)