Barber v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
16 N.E.2d 94, 278 N.Y. 540, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1387
This text of 16 N.E.2d 94 (Barber v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barber v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc., 16 N.E.2d 94, 278 N.Y. 540, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1387 (N.Y. 1938).
Opinion
In each action: judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hobbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippet, JJ. Dissenting as to Jewel Tea Co., Inc.: Lehman and O’Brien, JJ. TaMng no part: Crane, Ch. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Leotta v. Plessinger
171 N.E.2d 454 (New York Court of Appeals, 1960)
Adams v. State
269 A.D. 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Haase v. City of Buffalo
255 A.D. 357 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 N.E.2d 94, 278 N.Y. 540, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-jewel-tea-co-inc-ny-1938.