Barber v. Jacobson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 2004
Docket04-6749
StatusUnpublished

This text of Barber v. Jacobson (Barber v. Jacobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barber v. Jacobson, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6749

OVELL T. BARBER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARC JACOBSON, Judge, Norfolk Circuit Court; MICHAEL T. JUDGE, Assistant Attorney General,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-195-2)

Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 23, 2004

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ovell T. Barber, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ovell T. Barber appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court. See Barber v. Jacobson,

No. CA-04-195-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 16, 2004). We deny Barber’s motion

for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Barber v. Jacobson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-jacobson-ca4-2004.