Barber v. Jacobson
This text of Barber v. Jacobson (Barber v. Jacobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6749
OVELL T. BARBER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARC JACOBSON, Judge, Norfolk Circuit Court; MICHAEL T. JUDGE, Assistant Attorney General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-195-2)
Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 23, 2004
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ovell T. Barber, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Ovell T. Barber appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
on the reasoning of the district court. See Barber v. Jacobson,
No. CA-04-195-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 16, 2004). We deny Barber’s motion
for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barber v. Jacobson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-jacobson-ca4-2004.