Barber v. Ivey (DEATH PENALTY)

District Court, M.D. Alabama·Decided July 10, 2023·No. 2:23-cv-00342·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES EDWARD BARBER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:23-cv-342-ECM ) (WO) KAY IVEY, Governor of the State of ) Alabama, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

O R D E R Now pending before the Court is the Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. 44). On July 9, 2023, the Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (Doc. 52). The amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. See Hoefling v. City of Miami, 811 F.3d 1271, 1277 (11th Cir. 2016) (“[W]hen [plaintiff] filed the second amended complaint, the first amended complaint . . . became a legal nullity.”). Accordingly, upon consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. 44) is DENIED as moot. DONE this 10th day of July, 2023.

/s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barber v. Ivey (DEATH PENALTY), (M.D. Ala. 2023).

Barber v. Ivey (DEATH PENALTY) (Barber v. Ivey (DEATH PENALTY)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James Edward Hoefling, Jr. v. City of Miami
811 F.3d 1271 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)