Barber v. Harris

Fourth Circuit

Barber v. Harris

353 F. App'x 814

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2009·No. No. 09-6711·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlton Barber, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Barber’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barber v. Harris, No. 5:08-ct-03153-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and [815]*815legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlton Barber, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Barber’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barber v. Harris, No. 5:08-ct-03153-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and [815]*815legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Barber v. Harris, 353 F. App'x 814 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

353 F. App'x 814 (Barber v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related