Barber v. Florida Industrial Commission

166 So. 2d 142, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2548
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 10, 1964·No. No. 33075·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a consideration of the record, briefs and after oral argument, we have concluded that the Florida Industrial Commission committed no- error in remanding the matter to the Deputy Commissioner for a reexamination of the extent of the petitioner’s permanent disability. The writ of certiorari is, therefore, denied.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barber v. Florida Industrial Commission, 166 So. 2d 142, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2548 (Fla. 1964).

166 So. 2d 142 (Barber v. Florida Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bussie v. Long
243 So. 2d 776 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1971)
State ex rel. Butscher v. Dickinson
196 So. 2d 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
McNayr v. State
166 So. 2d 142 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)