Home/New York Court of Appeals/Barber v. Dembroski

Barber v. Dembroski

426 N.E.2d 175, 54 N.Y.2d 648, 442 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2609
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 29, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 426 N.E.2d 175 (Barber v. Dembroski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barber v. Dembroski, 426 N.E.2d 175, 54 N.Y.2d 648, 442 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2609 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Appellants’ contentions that the statute and implementing order violates the First Amendment of the United.States Constitution and section 7 of article VII of the New York Constitution were not raised in his answer and thus are not reviewable in this court. We find no merit to the appellant’s other contentions.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cibro Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Chu
492 N.E.2d 394 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Matherson v. Marchello
100 A.D.2d 233 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Melahn v. Hearn
459 N.E.2d 156 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Barber v. Bullard
93 A.D.2d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Eagle v. Paterson
442 N.E.2d 56 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
426 N.E.2d 175, 54 N.Y.2d 648, 442 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-dembroski-ny-1981.