Barber v. City of Rome

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Barber v. City of Rome

93 S.E. 26, 20 Ga. App. 414, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 918

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 29, 1917

Docket8450

StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 26 (Barber v. City of Rome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barber v. City of Rome, 93 S.E. 26, 20 Ga. App. 414, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 918 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Where, upon the trial of an action for damages against a city, for physical injuries alleged to have been caused by a nail in a plank which the city had placed in the street for pedestrians to walk on, it did not appear, from the evidence, that the city had in fact placed the plank as alleged, or how long it had been so placed, the court did not err in granting a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.

Action for damages; from Floyd superior court—Judge Wright. January 12, 1917.

Eubanks & Mebane, for plaintiff. Max Meyerhardt, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI