Barber v. Burrows

51 Cal. 404, 1876 Cal. LEXIS 61
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1876
DocketNo. 4447
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 51 Cal. 404 (Barber v. Burrows) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barber v. Burrows, 51 Cal. 404, 1876 Cal. LEXIS 61 (Cal. 1876).

Opinion

By the Court:

The instrument of September 2, 1872, was never completely executed. It is evident upon an inspection of the writing itself that it was intended to be signed by all the parties to the contract upon which it was indorsed. These parties were the two principals in the contract and the two sureties upon the bond attached to and forming a part of the contract. It was signed by but three of these persons.

As the contract for the extension of time was not complete, it was not obligatory.

Judgment and order denying a now trial affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Angell v. Rowlands
85 Cal. App. 3d 536 (California Court of Appeal, 1978)
American Aeronautics Corp. v. Grand Central Aircraft Co.
317 P.2d 694 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
In re Quartz Crystal Products Co.
71 F. Supp. 949 (S.D. California, 1947)
Anthony MacAroni Co. v. Nunziato
43 P.2d 315 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Gelfan v. Bessolo & Gualano, Inc.
13 P.2d 793 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Winter v. Kitto
279 P. 1024 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Pennington & Co. v. Hedlund Box & Shingle Co.
199 P. 235 (Washington Supreme Court, 1921)
Empson Packing Co. v. Lamb-Davis Lumber Co.
191 P. 833 (Washington Supreme Court, 1920)
Eastern Outfitting Co., Inc. v. Myers
180 P. 669 (California Court of Appeal, 1918)
Harris v. Lyons
138 N.W. 295 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1912)
Schulte v. Meehan
133 Ill. App. 491 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1907)
Commonwealth v. Bartlett
76 N.E. 607 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Sawyer v. Campbell
107 Iowa 397 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1899)
Jackson v. Torrence
23 P. 695 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Gregory v. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad
10 Neb. 250 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Cal. 404, 1876 Cal. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-burrows-cal-1876.