Barber v. Bull
This text of 7 Watts & Serg. 391 (Barber v. Bull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The point in this case seems to have been settled in Crouse v. Miller, (10 Serg. & Rawle 155), in which evidence of the general character of a clerk, who was absent from the State, was received to impeach the character of books of original entries kept by him, because his handwriting stood in the place of his oath. This is a stronger case, for the party was actually sworn, and his character was consequently open to accusation. His books, too, stood in the place of a witness, and might be discredited by showing them to be notoriously unworthy of confidence ; which could not be done, however, without descending to particulars. The evidence, therefore, was properly received.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Watts & Serg. 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-bull-pa-1844.