Barber v. Barnes
This text of 4 S.C.L. 491 (Barber v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
declared the opinion of the court, against the motion. The evidence given did not prove any right to this sort of remedy, or, indeed, to any other. There was no evidence at all of any force used, or threatened, from whichrthe loss could possibly be presumed to have been an immediate consequence. If any blame can be imputed to the defendants, in relation to the loss in question, it ¡must arise from a presumption that the negro was persuaded, or ■encouraged, by them to engage in the business in which he was when the accident, occasioning the loss, happened. But, admit. •ting the truth of this presumption, the conclusion will not follow, ■that this action can be maintained. The injury cannot be considered as flowing directly from any act of trespass committed forcibly. The distinction is too clear to admit of question.
Motion rejected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 S.C.L. 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-barnes-sc-1811.