Barber v. Barber

30 A.2d 278, 92 N.H. 523, 1943 N.H. LEXIS 127
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJanuary 5, 1943
DocketNo. 3380.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 A.2d 278 (Barber v. Barber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barber v. Barber, 30 A.2d 278, 92 N.H. 523, 1943 N.H. LEXIS 127 (N.H. 1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The bill of exceptions relates only to the construction of the private agreement between the parties. Whether a plaintiff is entitled to alimony is a question of fact. Cross v. Cross, 63 N. H. 444, 446. . While the agreement may be relevant to the issue, it is not controlling, ahd is only one of many factors of bearing. The construction of the agreement will become immaterial if alimony is denied, although the agreement is construed according to the plaintiff’s claim. The right to alimony not having been determined and not being shown to be dependent upon the construction of the agreement, action upon it at this stage of the proceeding is inexpedient. Lemire v. Haley, ante, 10, 358, and cases cited.

Case discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ballou v. Ballou
58 A.2d 311 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.2d 278, 92 N.H. 523, 1943 N.H. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-barber-nh-1943.