BARBER, RICHARD W. v. ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 3, 2014·No. CA 14-00391·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

944 CA 14-00391 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

RICHARD W. BARBER, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD A. BARBER, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND G.H. MINER CO., INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, NEW YORK CITY (JUDY C. SELMECI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BELLUCK & FOX, LLP, NEW YORK CITY (SETH A. DYMOND OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Charles C. Merrell, J.), entered January 14, 2014. The order denied the motion of defendant G.H. Miner Co., Inc. for summary judgment dismissing all causes of action against it.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on July 17, 2014,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: October 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARBER, RICHARD W. v. ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

BARBER, RICHARD W. v. ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION (BARBER, RICHARD W. v. ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.