Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Young

68 Mo. App. 175, 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 514
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 22, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 Mo. App. 175 (Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Young, 68 Mo. App. 175, 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 514 (Mo. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

Biggs, J.

This is an action on a special tax bill for- the reconstruction of a street in the city of St. Louis. The petition charges that the bill is a lien on the defendant’s real estate. The ordinances under which the work was done and the subsequent steps were needlessly set forth. It would have been sufficient to aver the issuance of the tax bill by the city authorities, and that the defendants were the owners of the property sought to be charged. The circuit court sustained a general demurrer to the petition. Ttíe plaintiff having [177]*177declined to amend, final judgment was entered on the demurrer. ■

pehtion: demuner. The petition in this case is substantially the same as that in Seaboard National Bank v. Wright et al., number 6557, recently decided by us. A general demurrer was sustained in that case. The ruling was held to be error for the reason that nothing appeared on the face of the petition to show that the tax bill was invalid. We must so decide in this case. The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barrie v. Ranson
46 S.W.2d 186 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 Mo. App. 175, 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-asphalt-paving-co-v-young-moctapp-1896.