Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. City of New York
83 N.Y.S. 1102
Opinion
There is presented upon this appeal the same question that was presented in the case of William G. Rose v. Seth Low, as Mayor, et al. (decided herewith) 83 N. Y. Supp. 598; and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. City of New York, 83 N.Y.S. 1102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).
83 N.Y.S. 1102 (Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rose v. Low
85 A.D. 461 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)