Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. City of New York

83 N.Y.S. 1102

This text of 83 N.Y.S. 1102 (Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. City of New York, 83 N.Y.S. 1102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

INGRAHAM, J.

There is presented upon this appeal the same question that was presented in the case of William G. Rose v. Seth Low, as Mayor, et al. (decided herewith) 83 N. Y. Supp. 598; and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rose v. Low
85 A.D. 461 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 N.Y.S. 1102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-asphalt-pav-co-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1903.