Barbee v. Heflin

1 White & W. 409
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 20, 1880
DocketNo. 760, Op. Book No. 2, p. 257
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 409 (Barbee v. Heflin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barbee v. Heflin, 1 White & W. 409 (Tex. Ct. App. 1880).

Opinion

Opinion by

Clark, J.

§ 7 44. Levy of execution; is valid, though made without demand upon defendant, unless, etc. New principles are better settled under our law than that .a sheriff, or other officer to whom a writ of execution is delivered, may levy the same upon property of the defendant without a demand upon the latter to point out and designate property upon which the levy should be made, and that such levy is valid if the defendant in execution, upon being apprised of the fact, fails or refuses to point out other property sufficient to satisfy the execution. [Kingsland, Ferguson & Co. v. Harrell, post, p. 403; Ross v. Lister, 14 Tex. 469; Smith v. Frederick, 32 Tex. 256.]

§ 745. Burden is upon defendant to show that he offered to point out property. The evidence of appellee shows that a week before the levy he was requested by the sheriff to point out property, and refused, and that after the levy he did not offer to point out other property, because no one asked him to do so. The law at this juncture devolved upon him a necessity for affirmative action without awaiting further solicitation.

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ross v. Lister
14 Tex. 469 (Texas Supreme Court, 1855)
Smith v. Frederick
32 Tex. 256 (Texas Supreme Court, 1869)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barbee-v-heflin-texapp-1880.