Barbara R. Burns v. City of Apple Valley

30 F. App'x 670
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 2002
Docket01-2835, 01-3437
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 F. App'x 670 (Barbara R. Burns v. City of Apple Valley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barbara R. Burns v. City of Apple Valley, 30 F. App'x 670 (8th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Barbara R. Burns appeals the District Court’s 1 denial of her motion for a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order (Case No. 01-2538), and the District Court’s 2 subsequent adverse grant of summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action (Case No. 01-3437).

Although Burns filed a brief in Case No. 01-2538 before the District Court entered final judgment against her, she has consistently declined to file a brief in Case No. 01-3437 even after we issued a show cause order and a revised briefing schedule. Thus, we grant appellees’ motion to dismiss Case No. 01-3437. See Fed. R.App. P. 31(c).

As to Case No. 01-2538, an interlocutory appeal from the denial of preliminary injunctive relief becomes moot once final judgment is entered. See Taylor v. United States, 181 F.3d 1017, 1022 & n. 9 (9th Cir.1999) (en banc); Hankins v. Temple Univ., 829 F.2d 437, 438 & n. 1 (3d Cir.1987). Accordingly, we dismiss Case No. 01-2538 as well.

We also deny Burns’s motion for injunctive relief on appeal. Contrary to her assertion, the District Court was not divested of jurisdiction once she filed her interlocutory appeal and thus it had the authority to grant final judgment in favor of defendants. See Janousek v. Doyle, 313 F.2d 916, 920-21 (8th Cir.1963) (per curiam). Given the disposition of Burns’s appeal, we decline to address her other motions.

Accordingly, we grant appellees’ motion to dismiss Case No. 01-3437, and we dismiss Case No. 01-2538 as moot.

1

. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

2

. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wesley Brooks v. Tom Roy
556 F. App'x 553 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)
Burns v. City of Apple Valley, Minnesota
537 U.S. 1051 (Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 F. App'x 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barbara-r-burns-v-city-of-apple-valley-ca8-2002.