Barbara Metz v. Wyeth LLC

525 F. App'x 893
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 1, 2013
Docket12-13321
StatusUnpublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 525 F. App'x 893 (Barbara Metz v. Wyeth LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barbara Metz v. Wyeth LLC, 525 F. App'x 893 (11th Cir. 2013).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The Metz’s case had a bad two days in June, as their attorney has recognized in a model display of professionalism. The opinions in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2466, 186 L.Ed.2d 607 (2013), and Guarino v. Wyeth, LLC, et al., 719 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir.2013), disposed of all the claims before us, including the Metz’s negligent design claim against Wyeth and Schwarz. See Guarino, 719 F.3d at 1250-52. The judgment of the district court therefore is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disarro v. EzriCare, LLC
M.D. Florida, 2023
Davis v. Actavis, Inc.
N.D. Illinois, 2020
Trisvan v. Heyman
305 F. Supp. 3d 381 (E.D. New York, 2018)
Tsavaris v. Pfizer, Inc.
154 F. Supp. 3d 1327 (S.D. Florida, 2016)
Wyeth, Inc. v. Danny Weeks and Vicki Weeks
159 So. 3d 649 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
525 F. App'x 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barbara-metz-v-wyeth-llc-ca11-2013.