Barbara Metz v. Wyeth LLC

525 F. App'x 893
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 1, 2013·No. 12-13321·Unpublished·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The Metz’s case had a bad two days in June, as their attorney has recognized in a model display of professionalism. The opinions in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2466, 186 L.Ed.2d 607 (2013), and Guarino v. Wyeth, LLC, et al., 719 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir.2013), disposed of all the claims before us, including the Metz’s negligent design claim against Wyeth and Schwarz. See Guarino, 719 F.3d at 1250-52. The judgment of the district court therefore is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barbara Metz v. Wyeth LLC, 525 F. App'x 893 (11th Cir. 2013).

525 F. App'x 893 (Barbara Metz v. Wyeth LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disarro v. EzriCare, LLC
M.D. Florida, 2023
Davis v. Actavis, Inc.
N.D. Illinois, 2020
Trisvan v. Heyman
305 F. Supp. 3d 381 (E.D. New York, 2018)
Tsavaris v. Pfizer, Inc.
154 F. Supp. 3d 1327 (S.D. Florida, 2016)
Wyeth, Inc. v. Danny Weeks and Vicki Weeks
159 So. 3d 649 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2014)