Barbara Ludowese v. Cynthia D Trombley-Martin

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 24, 2020·No. 160777·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 24, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

160777 & (16)

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

BARBARA LUDOWESE and ROBERT Elizabeth T. Clement SCOTT MARTIN, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices

Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants- Appellees,

v SC: 160777 COA: 351488 St. Clair PC: 17-000189-CZ CYNTHIA D. TROMBLEY-MARTIN, Defendant/Counterplaintiff- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 24, 2020

s0121 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barbara Ludowese v. Cynthia D Trombley-Martin, (Mich. 2020).

Barbara Ludowese v. Cynthia D Trombley-Martin (Barbara Ludowese v. Cynthia D Trombley-Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.