Barbara Ludowese v. Cynthia D Trombley-Martin
This text of Barbara Ludowese v. Cynthia D Trombley-Martin (Barbara Ludowese v. Cynthia D Trombley-Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
January 24, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160777 & (16) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein BARBARA LUDOWESE and ROBERT Elizabeth T. Clement SCOTT MARTIN, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants- Appellees, v SC: 160777 COA: 351488 St. Clair PC: 17-000189-CZ CYNTHIA D. TROMBLEY-MARTIN, Defendant/Counterplaintiff- Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 24, 2020 s0121 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barbara Ludowese v. Cynthia D Trombley-Martin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barbara-ludowese-v-cynthia-d-trombley-martin-mich-2020.