Barbara Burns v. Sudhir Goyal
This text of Barbara Burns v. Sudhir Goyal (Barbara Burns v. Sudhir Goyal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 138 SSM 22 Barbara Burns, &c., Appellant, v. Sudhir Goyal, et al., Defendants, Rakesh B. Patel, et al., Respondents.
Submitted by Frank N. Ambrosino, for appellant. Submitted by Christopher Simone, for respondents Patel et al. Submitted by Vincent Petrozzo, for respondents Torelli et al.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order modified, with costs to plaintiff against defendants Rakesh B. Patel and Suffolk Heart Group, LLP and to defendants Michael Torelli and South Shore Family Practice Associates, P.C. against plaintiff, by denying the motion of defendants Rakesh B. Patel and Suffolk Heart Group, LLP for summary judgment and, as so modified, affirmed. On this record, triable questions of fact preclude summary judgment in favor of these defendants. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.
Decided October 12, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barbara Burns v. Sudhir Goyal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barbara-burns-v-sudhir-goyal-ny-2017.