Barbara B Smith v. Jessica Rae Woll

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 19, 2021·No. 162696·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 19, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

162696 & (16)(17) Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement

BARBARA B. SMITH, Megan K. Cavanagh Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

v SC: 162696 COA: 356065 Oakland CC: 2018-168918-NI JESSICA RAE WOLL and WOLL & WOLL, PC, Defendants-Appellants.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2021 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.

BERNSTEIN, J., not participating because he has a family member with an interest that could be affected by the proceeding.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 19, 2021

b0316 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barbara B Smith v. Jessica Rae Woll, (Mich. 2021).

Barbara B Smith v. Jessica Rae Woll (Barbara B Smith v. Jessica Rae Woll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.