Barba v. State
This text of 226 S.W.2d 453 (Barba v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of unlawfully possessing a narcotic drug, towit: morphine sulphate tablets. He entered his plea of guilty before a jury, which fixed his punishment at two years in the penitentiary.
[454]*454He perfected an appeal to this court, and the record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 S.W.2d 453, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barba-v-state-texcrimapp-1950.