Barash v. PSI Industries, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Barash v. PSI Industries, Inc.

733 So. 2d 1119, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7299, 1999 WL 346128

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 2, 1999

DocketNo. 98-4090

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 733 So. 2d 1119 (Barash v. PSI Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barash v. PSI Industries, Inc., 733 So. 2d 1119, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7299, 1999 WL 346128 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Jonathan Barash seeks review of a temporary injunction to the extent that it enjoined him from competing with PSI Industries. He argues that such relief was not requested. We agree and remand for the trial court to strike that portion of the order as enforcement of the noncompete provision of the confidentiality agreement was not before the trial court. See e.g. Williford v. Melbourne Commercial Dev., Inc., 682 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

We note that Barash also argues that the $1,000.00 bond ordered is inadequate. The trial court may reconsider the amount of bond upon Barash’s filing of an appropriate motion.

Accordingly, we remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WARNER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI