Barash v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barash v. City of New York

270 A.D. 945, 62 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4811

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 20, 1946·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from order granting defendant’s motion to change the venue of the action from the county of Kings to the county of New York, and denying plaintiffs’ cross motion to retain the venue in Kings County. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The right to a preference in a contract action accorded to a resident of Kings County may only be considered in respect of an action begun in the first instance as a matter of right in Kings County, and may not be considered when begun in disregard of section 182-b of the Civil Practice Act. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order granting defendant’s motion to change the venue of the action from the county of Kings to the county of New York, and denying plaintiffs’ cross motion to retain the venue in Kings County. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The right to a preference in a contract action accorded to a resident of Kings County may only be considered in respect of an action begun in the first instance as a matter of right in Kings County, and may not be considered when begun in disregard of section 182-b of the Civil Practice Act. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Barash v. City of New York, 270 A.D. 945, 62 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

270 A.D. 945 (Barash v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related