Barasch v. Williams Real Estate Co.

100 A.D.3d 562, 954 N.Y.S.2d 527

This text of 100 A.D.3d 562 (Barasch v. Williams Real Estate Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barasch v. Williams Real Estate Co., 100 A.D.3d 562, 954 N.Y.S.2d 527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered on or about November 7, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted petitioner an appraisal of the fair value of her shares in respondent Williams Real Estate Co., Inc. and denied Williams’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the petition as against it, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Williams sent a formal notice to its shareholders, stating that a meeting would be held to consider “[t]he authorization ... of the proposed disposition of substantially all of [its] assets” (emphasis added). In reliance thereon, petitioner chose to exercise her appraisal rights under Business Corporation Law § 910 (a) instead of, for example, seeking to enjoin the transaction. Hence, Williams is estopped from denying that it disposed of substantially all of its assets (see Matter of McKay v Teleprompter Corp., 19 AD2d 815 [1st Dept 1963], appeal dismissed 13 NY2d 1058 [1963]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, Richter, AbdusSalaam and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKay v. Teleprompter Corp.
19 A.D.2d 815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.3d 562, 954 N.Y.S.2d 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barasch-v-williams-real-estate-co-nyappdiv-2012.