Baranovsky v. Sanchez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baranovsky v. Sanchez

81 A.D.2d 601, 441 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11085

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 13, 1981·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by Victor Lubczenko, a defendant in Action No. 1, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 19, 1980, as, upon granting his motion to “rehear” a previously denied motion to consolidate, adhered to the original determination denying consolidation. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, original determination vacated and motion to consolidate granted. Under the facts herein, where both actions arose out of the same automobile accident, it was error to deny consolidation (see Paolo v Eilat, 51 AD2d 585). Titone, J.P., Gulotta, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by Victor Lubczenko, a defendant in Action No. 1, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 19, 1980, as, upon granting his motion to “rehear” a previously denied motion to consolidate, adhered to the original determination denying consolidation. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, original determination vacated and motion to consolidate granted. Under the facts herein, where both actions arose out of the same automobile accident, it was error to deny consolidation (see Paolo v Eilat, 51 AD2d 585). Titone, J.P., Gulotta, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Baranovsky v. Sanchez, 81 A.D.2d 601, 441 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11085 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

81 A.D.2d 601 (Baranovsky v. Sanchez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related