Baranovsky v. Sanchez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baranovsky v. Sanchez

81 A.D.2d 601, 441 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11085

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 601 (Baranovsky v. Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baranovsky v. Sanchez, 81 A.D.2d 601, 441 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11085 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by Victor Lubczenko, a defendant in Action No. 1, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 19, 1980, as, upon granting his motion to “rehear” a previously denied motion to consolidate, adhered to the original determination denying consolidation. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, original determination vacated and motion to consolidate granted. Under the facts herein, where both actions arose out of the same automobile accident, it was error to deny consolidation (see Paolo v Eilat, 51 AD2d 585). Titone, J.P., Gulotta, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by Victor Lubczenko, a defendant in Action No. 1, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 19, 1980, as, upon granting his motion to “rehear” a previously denied motion to consolidate, adhered to the original determination denying consolidation. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, original determination vacated and motion to consolidate granted. Under the facts herein, where both actions arose out of the same automobile accident, it was error to deny consolidation (see Paolo v Eilat, 51 AD2d 585). Titone, J.P., Gulotta, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 601, 441 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baranovsky-v-sanchez-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack