Barajas v. Ashford TRS Walnut Creek LLC
This text of Barajas v. Ashford TRS Walnut Creek LLC (Barajas v. Ashford TRS Walnut Creek LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 KATHLEEN BARAJAS, Case No. 20-cv-01676-CRB 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 10 v. DISMISS AS MOOT 11 ASHFORD TRS WALNUT CREEK LLC, 12 Defendant. 13 On March 9, 2020, Plaintiff Kathleen Barajas sued Defendants Ashford TRS Walnut Creek 14 || LLC and Does 1-10 for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and California’s Unruh 3 15 || Act. See Compl. (dkt. 1). On March 22, 2021, Ashford TRS moved to dismiss this case for lack a 16 || of Article II standing and for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted. See Mot. to 2 17 || Dismiss (dkt. 22) at 1. On April 2, 2021, Barajas filed an amended complaint (as she was entitled Z 18 || to do under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). See Amend. Compl. (dkt. 28); Fed. 19 |] R. Civ. P. 15(a). Given the amended complaint, the Court denies Ashord TRS’s motion to dismiss 20 || the original complaint as moot. See Ramirez v. Cnty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 21 || (9th Cir. 2015). 22 IT ISSO ORDERED. 23 Dated: April 8, 2021 CHARLES R. BREYER 24 United States District Judge 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barajas v. Ashford TRS Walnut Creek LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barajas-v-ashford-trs-walnut-creek-llc-cand-2021.