Barahona v. Long Island Ambulatory Surgery Center, L.L.C.

137 A.D.3d 679, 27 N.Y.S.3d 374
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 2016·No. 647 805268/13·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*680 Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about August 11, 2014, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint without prejudice to the commencement of a new action within six months, pursuant to CPLR 205 (a), upon plaintiff’s receipt of permanent letters of administration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff timely commenced this action, providing notice of the claim to defendants before the statue of limitations ran, and the dismissal was not on the merits but because of the lack of proper letters of administration, which plaintiff was in the process of obtaining (see Carmenate v City of New York, 59 AD3d 162 [1st Dept 2009]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barahona v. Long Island Ambulatory Surgery Center, L.L.C., 137 A.D.3d 679, 27 N.Y.S.3d 374 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

137 A.D.3d 679 (Barahona v. Long Island Ambulatory Surgery Center, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Almanzar v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.
2025 NY Slip Op 25020 (New York Supreme Court, Bronx County, 2025)