Barad v. Bank of Commerce

27 A.D.2d 848, 280 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4590

This text of 27 A.D.2d 848 (Barad v. Bank of Commerce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barad v. Bank of Commerce, 27 A.D.2d 848, 280 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 14, 1966, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs, on the ground that the complaint failed to allege facts from which damages can properly be inferred (Watts v. Bank of Manhattan Co., 83 N. Y. S. 2d 57, affd. 274 App. Div. 884; cf. Daukas v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., 26 A D 2d 526). The time to serve an amended complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Appeal from order of said court dated January 14, 1966 dismissed, without costs. Said order was superseded by the order dated March 14, 1966 and made on reargument. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [See 48 Misc 2d 839.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watts v. Bank of Manhattan Co.
274 A.D. 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Barad v. Bank of Commerce
48 Misc. 2d 839 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.2d 848, 280 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barad-v-bank-of-commerce-nyappdiv-1967.