Barad v. Bank of Commerce

27 A.D.2d 848, 280 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4590
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barad v. Bank of Commerce. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 A.D.2d 809

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 14, 1966, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs, on the ground that the complaint failed to allege facts from which damages can properly be inferred (Watts v. Bank of Manhattan Co., 83 N. Y. S. 2d 57, affd. 274 App. Div. 884; cf. Daukas v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., 26 A D 2d 526). The time to serve an amended complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Appeal from order of said court dated January 14, 1966 dismissed, without costs. Said order was superseded by the order dated March 14, 1966 and made on reargument. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [See 48 Misc 2d 839.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barad v. Bank of Commerce, 27 A.D.2d 848, 280 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

27 A.D.2d 848 (Barad v. Bank of Commerce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watts v. Bank of Manhattan Co.
274 A.D. 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Barad v. Bank of Commerce
48 Misc. 2d 839 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)