Bara v. Personnel Appeal Board

314 A.2d 434, 30 Conn. Super. Ct. 333, 30 Conn. Supp. 333, 1973 Conn. Super. LEXIS 179
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedDecember 19, 1973
DocketFile No. 109824
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 314 A.2d 434 (Bara v. Personnel Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bara v. Personnel Appeal Board, 314 A.2d 434, 30 Conn. Super. Ct. 333, 30 Conn. Supp. 333, 1973 Conn. Super. LEXIS 179 (Colo. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

The plaintiff's appeal from the defendant board is in two counts. The demurrer to the first count is on the ground that it fails to allege facts sufficient to justify a nullification or reversal of the defendant's decision. A prayer for relief is demurred to on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction to grant declaratory relief in this proceeding.

The first count alleges that the defendant board, which heard the plaintiff's appeal from his dismissal on February 8, 1973, and March 8, 1973, failed to render its decision within ninety days from the date of the hearing as required by § 5-202 (c) of the General Statutes. If it is assumed that the board did not render its decision within ninety days, the failure of the board to do so would not constitute a ground for invalidating its decision.Romano v. Connecticut State Welfare Dept., 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 138, 143. *Page 334

As to the ground of demurrer that the court lacks jurisdiction to grant a declaratory judgment, § 4-183 (g) of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (General Statutes, c. 54) empowers the court to affirm, reverse, or modify an agency's decision or to remand the case to the agency for further proceedings. An appeal from an administrative agency is a special statutory proceeding and not a "civil action" as is a declaratory judgment case.Bank Building Equipment Corporation v. ArchitecturalExamining Board, 153 Conn. 121, 124.

For the above reasons the demurrer is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallingford Board of Education v. State Board on Education
418 A.2d 961 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1980)
President Fellows of Harvard College v. Ledyard
343 A.2d 649 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1975)
President of Harvard College v. Town of Ledyard
32 Conn. Supp. 139 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
314 A.2d 434, 30 Conn. Super. Ct. 333, 30 Conn. Supp. 333, 1973 Conn. Super. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bara-v-personnel-appeal-board-connsuperct-1973.